[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUDYOa0hrc5qif4k@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:34:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: intel-lpss: Add check for platform_get_irq
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:36:42AM +0000, Chen Ni wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() might be failed and return a negative result.
> So there should have an error handling code.
NAK.
Have you checked the implementation of intel_lpcc_probe()?
> Fixes: 4b45efe85263 ("mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices")
It does not fix anything, except maybe an error code.
Also it misses PCI counterpart.
...
That said, I would expect that in intel_lpss_probe() the unset / erroneous IRQ
(which actually shouldn't be checked against 0 at all) should be returned as is.
i.e.
if (!info || !info->mem || info->irq <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
be converted to
if (!info || !info->mem)
return -EINVAL;
if (info->irq < 0)
return info->irq;
That kind of patch I will accept.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists