linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231031-proviant-anrollen-d2245037ce97@brauner>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:02:47 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl

> The follow up including a statement about "being arsed" once more was
> to Christian, not you and was rather "tongue in cheek".

Fyi, I can't be arsed to be talked to like that.

> Whether the patch is ready for reviews and whatnot is your call to
> make as the author.

This is basically why that patch never staid in -next. Dave said this
patch is meaningless without his other patchs and I had no reason to
doubt that claim nor currently the cycles to benchmark and disprove it.