[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a6ba550-6115-47ab-b724-5e29d64a1b2e@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:38:18 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
rfoss@...nel.org, todor.too@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for named
power-domains
On 31/10/2023 10:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 26.10.2023 17:50, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
>> requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.
>>
>> Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
>> can come in any order.
>>
>> After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
>> resource declration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
>> we fall back to the default legacy indexing.
>>
>> From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
>> power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> index ebd5da6ad3f2f..cb48723efd8a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> @@ -1381,7 +1381,29 @@ int msm_vfe_subdev_init(struct camss *camss, struct vfe_device *vfe,
>> if (!res->line_num)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - if (res->has_pd) {
>> + /* Power domain */
> Unnecessary, I think
>
Consistent with existing commentary in this function ->
/* Memory */
/* Interrupts */
>> +
>> + if (res->pd_name) {
> No need to nullcheck, dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name seems to return
> NULL when the name is NULL
It looks so. Then again I'm sure checking here saves a few instructions
and stack operations..
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists