[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231031154631.61e5f83e@xps-13>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:46:31 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree with the vfs-brauner
tree
Hi Christian,
brauner@...nel.org wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:25:19 +0100:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> > richard@....at wrote on Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:13:53 +0100 (CET):
> >
> > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > > Von: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > > >> Miquel, we could also keep ff6abbe85634 in the mtd tree and explain Linus the
> > > >> conflict, what do you think? That would help with back porting to stable.
> > > >
> > > > It's not relevant if the patch in Brauner's tree is already fixing this
> > > > up. Just send the smaller patch to stable@...r.kernel.org asking them to
> > > > backport this patch instead of the other one, they are used to this
> > > > kind of constraint, no?
> > >
> > > I'm just in fear of stable rule #1.
> > > "It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream)."
> >
> > It should be very soon, the merge window is open ;)
>
> vfs-6.7.super was merged yesterday, if that's what this is about.
Great, thanks for the confirmation. Then Richard you have your upstream
commit already!
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists