linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/radeon/ni_dpm: add an error code check in ni_dpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231101025752.988228-1-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date:   Wed,  1 Nov 2023 10:57:53 +0800
From:   Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To:     alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/ni_dpm: add an error code check in ni_dpm_init

ni_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage() return zero or
negative error code. But ni_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage()
doesn't check the return value of the first function call. It's same for
ni_dpm_init(). It's better to add this error code check.

Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni_dpm.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni_dpm.c
index 3e1c1a392fb7..f521dc929a06 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni_dpm.c
@@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ static int ni_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage(struct radeon_device *rde
 
 	ret = ni_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(rdev,
 								&rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_sclk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = ni_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(rdev,
 								&rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_mclk);
@@ -4098,7 +4100,12 @@ int ni_dpm_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_dispclk.entries[3].clk = 72000;
 	rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_dispclk.entries[3].v = 900;
 
-	ni_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage(rdev);
+	ret = ni_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage(rdev);
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_dispclk.entries);
+		r600_free_extended_power_table(rdev);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	if (rdev->pm.dpm.voltage_response_time == 0)
 		rdev->pm.dpm.voltage_response_time = R600_VOLTAGERESPONSETIME_DFLT;
-- 
2.30.2