[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <014c446a-23c4-40f9-9512-6869a9b02117@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 03:24:36 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process_durations()
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 08:41:39AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 31/10/2023 à 23:47, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:21:14AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 09:55:16AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
> > > > > iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
> > > > > Data is written directly at the correct place.
> > > >
> > > > Makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> > >
> > > Queued and pushed, thank you all!
> >
> > But an allmodconfig build complains about seq_buf_putc() being undefined,
> > that is, not exported. I suspect that other seq_buf_*() functions in
> > this patch might also be complained about.
> >
> > I am dropping this for the moment. Please make it pass an allmodconfig
> > build so that I can pull it in again. Please see below for the commit.
>
> Ouch!
Believe me, I know that feeling! ;-)
> seq_buf_init(), seq_buf_terminate(), seq_buf_clear() are inlined functions
> in a .h file, so shouldn't be a problem.
>
> seq_buf_printf() is exported, but seq_buf_putc() is not!
> Really odd to me.
>
> Kees Cook (added in cc) suggests to use this API (see [1]) to avoid some
> potential issues and ease the management of NULL terminated strings in
> buffers. (#LinuxHardening).
>
> I'll propose to add the missing EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Very good, looking forward to seeing the result.
Thanx, Paul
> CJ
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310241629.0A4206316F@keescook/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists