linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/112] 6.5.10-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:28:12 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/112] 6.5.10-rc1 review

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:51:39PM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 10/31/23 10:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.10 release.
> > There are 112 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Nov 2023 16:58:38 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> The build fails on RISC-V.
> 
> arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function ‘set_huge_pte_at’:
> arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c:188:13: error: ‘sz’ undeclared (first use in
> this function); did you mean ‘s8’?
>   188 |         if (sz >= PGDIR_SIZE)
>       |             ^~
>       |             s8
> arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c:188:13: note: each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Caused by commit 16b6f77970f7a690c61de142511c9ac488d83e04
> 
> riscv: fix set_huge_pte_at() for NAPOT mappings when a swap entry is set
> 
> This patch requires mainline commit 62ba41d2761206664a1fdc998051324457da2dd6
> 
> mm: riscv: fix an unsafe pte read in huge_pte_alloc()

Thanks, I'll just drop this commit and wait for someone who cares about
riscv, and 6.5.y (it's only going to be alive for another few weeks), to
resend the needed changes.

greg k-h