[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60837E71B5BC7B20E172E334FCA7A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:33:20 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Peter Newman" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Fix unused variable warning in
cache_alloc_hsw_probe()
> No noticeable regressions on my Acer Aspire E15 (the laptop uses Intel Core
> i3 Haswell), thanks!
>
> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Thanks for reporting that you tested. I don't think a Haswell i3 gets as far as
the piece of code that I changed. the wrmsr_safe() will return non-zero and
the function returns before getting to the piece that I changed.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists