[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231101112415.b9e8a2a5b5a37ee06bd2abc3@hugovil.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:24:15 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mn-rve-gateway: add support for RVE
gateway board
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 15:16:50 +0000
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:43:02AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> >
> > The RVE gateway board is based on a Variscite VAR-SOM-NANO,
> > with a NXP MX8MN nano CPU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
> > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-rve-gateway.dts | 296 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 305 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn-rve-gateway.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index 9450b2c8a678..a1028fe8ed02 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -1007,6 +1007,7 @@ properties:
> > - fsl,imx8mn-ddr4-evk # i.MX8MN DDR4 EVK Board
> > - fsl,imx8mn-evk # i.MX8MN LPDDR4 EVK Board
> > - gw,imx8mn-gw7902 # i.MX8MM Gateworks Board
> > + - rve,rve-gateway # i.MX8MN RVE Gateway Board
> > - const: fsl,imx8mn
>
> Changes to dt-bindings should be in their own patch. Did checkpatch not
> whinge about this?
Hi,
yes it did and I very well saw it.
However, before sending my patches, I checked the log history to
see how patches for new boards were handled, and saw that new
boards (some) integrated all these changes together.
I will submit a new serie with all changes separated.
Hugo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists