lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1ed8776-d8ad-49f2-bf8f-2759256e33e9@acm.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 09:39:18 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     SEO HOYOUNG <hy50.seo@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
        kwangwon.min@...sung.com, kwmad.kim@...sung.com,
        sh425.lee@...sung.com, sc.suh@...sung.com,
        quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: core: Process abort completed command in
 MCQ mode

On 11/1/23 01:45, SEO HOYOUNG wrote:
> In MCQ mode, the case where OCS is updated to aborted is as follows
>   1. when abort processing is completed
>   2. When a duplicate command occurs

What is a "duplicate command"? The UFSHCI driver guarantees that each
SCSI command has a unique tag.

> In case of 1 situation, cmd should be re-request.

It should be resubmitted by the SCSI error handler. The UFSHCI driver
does not have to request this explicitly. See also the code at the end
of scmd_eh_abort_handler().

>   	case OCS_ABORTED:
> -		result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
> +		if (cqe)
> +			eec = le32_to_cpu(cqe->status) & MASK_EEC;
> +
> +		if (is_mcq_enabled(hba) && !eec)
> +			result |= DID_REQUEUE << 16;
> +		else
> +			result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
>   		break;

I don't think this change is necessary. Additionally, introducing
different behavior for MCQ compared to legacy mode in this code path is
suspicious. Why should how commands are queued affect how aborts are
processed?

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ