lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231102185934.773885-6-cmllamas@google.com>
Date:   Thu,  2 Nov 2023 18:59:06 +0000
From:   Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@...roid.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/21] binder: fix trivial typo of binder_free_buf_locked()

Fix minor misspelling of the function in the comment section.

No functional changes in this patch.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 0f966cba95c7 ("binder: add flag to clear buffer on txn complete")
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder_alloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
index 9b28d0f9666d..cd720bb5c9ce 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void binder_alloc_free_buf(struct binder_alloc *alloc,
 	/*
 	 * We could eliminate the call to binder_alloc_clear_buf()
 	 * from binder_alloc_deferred_release() by moving this to
-	 * binder_alloc_free_buf_locked(). However, that could
+	 * binder_free_buf_locked(). However, that could
 	 * increase contention for the alloc mutex if clear_on_free
 	 * is used frequently for large buffers. The mutex is not
 	 * needed for correctness here.
-- 
2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ