[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB5442868460921E488B525176A5A6A@OS0PR01MB5442.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:39:58 +0000
From: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Yasunori Gotou (Fujitsu)" <y-goto@...itsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drivers/base/node: Add demotion_nodes sys
infterface
> We have /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier*/nodelist
> already. A node in a higher tier can demote to any node in the lower
> tiers. What's more need to be displayed in nodeX/demotion_nodes?
IIRC, they are not the same. memory_tier[number], where the number is shared by
the memory using the same memory driver(dax/kmem etc). Not reflect the actual distance
across nodes(different distance will be grouped into the same memory_tier).
But demotion will only select the nearest nodelist to demote.
Below is an example, node0 node1 are DRAM, node2 node3 are PMEM, but distance to DRAM nodes
are different.
# numactl -H
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0
node 0 size: 964 MB
node 0 free: 746 MB
node 1 cpus: 1
node 1 size: 685 MB
node 1 free: 455 MB
node 2 cpus:
node 2 size: 896 MB
node 2 free: 897 MB
node 3 cpus:
node 3 size: 896 MB
node 3 free: 896 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 20 20 25
1: 20 10 25 20
2: 20 25 10 20
3: 25 20 20 10
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/demotion_nodes
2
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/demotion_nodes
3
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier22/nodelist
2-3
Thanks
Zhijian
(I hate the outlook native reply composition format.)
________________________________________
From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 11:17
To: Li, Zhijian/李 智坚
Cc: Andrew Morton; Greg Kroah-Hartman; rafael@...nel.org; linux-mm@...ck.org; Gotou, Yasunori/五�u 康文; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drivers/base/node: Add demotion_nodes sys infterface
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com> writes:
> It shows the demotion target nodes of a node. Export this information to
> user directly.
>
> Below is an example where node0 node1 are DRAM, node3 is a PMEM node.
> - Before PMEM is online, no demotion_nodes for node0 and node1.
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/demotion_nodes
> <show nothing>
> - After node3 is online as kmem
> $ daxctl reconfigure-device --mode=system-ram --no-online dax0.0 && daxctl online-memory dax0.0
> [
> {
> "chardev":"dax0.0",
> "size":1054867456,
> "target_node":3,
> "align":2097152,
> "mode":"system-ram",
> "online_memblocks":0,
> "total_memblocks":7
> }
> ]
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/demotion_nodes
> 3
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/demotion_nodes
> 3
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node3/demotion_nodes
> <show nothing>
We have /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier*/nodelist
already. A node in a higher tier can demote to any node in the lower
tiers. What's more need to be displayed in nodeX/demotion_nodes?
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 493d533f8375..27e8502548a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/memory.h>
> +#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> #include <linux/vmstat.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/node.h>
> @@ -569,11 +570,23 @@ static ssize_t node_read_distance(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(distance, 0444, node_read_distance, NULL);
>
> +static ssize_t demotion_nodes_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + nodemask_t nmask = next_demotion_nodes(dev->id);
> +
> + ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", nodemask_pr_args(&nmask));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(demotion_nodes);
> +
> static struct attribute *node_dev_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_meminfo.attr,
> &dev_attr_numastat.attr,
> &dev_attr_distance.attr,
> &dev_attr_vmstat.attr,
> + &dev_attr_demotion_nodes.attr,
> NULL
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index 437441cdf78f..8eb04923f965 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void init_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *default_type);
> void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype);
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> int next_demotion_node(int node);
> +nodemask_t next_demotion_nodes(int node);
> void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
> bool node_is_toptier(int node);
> #else
> @@ -46,6 +47,11 @@ static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
> return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> }
>
> +static inline next_demotion_nodes next_demotion_nodes(int node)
> +{
> + return NODE_MASK_NONE;
> +}
> +
> static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
> {
> *targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 37a4f59d9585..90047f37d98a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,14 @@ void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +nodemask_t next_demotion_nodes(int node)
> +{
> + if (!node_demotion)
> + return NODE_MASK_NONE;
> +
> + return node_demotion[node].preferred;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * next_demotion_node() - Get the next node in the demotion path
> * @node: The starting node to lookup the next node
Powered by blists - more mailing lists