[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083D8F1467F094A5F1993EAFCA6A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 22:02:50 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
CC: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Fix unused variable warning in
cache_alloc_hsw_probe()
> This is strange, I am not able to encounter this warning. Is my gcc perhaps
> too old? I know there were some specific versions needed to reproduce similar
> warnings with clang (see reference commit 793207bad71c ("x86/resctrl: Fix a silly
> -Wunused-but-set-variable warning")).
I'm using the default install from Fedora 38:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230728 (Red Hat 13.2.1-1)
Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists