linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] x86/mm: Add generic guest initialization hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <193a0476-042f-4766-9637-5ad25fd6f3e2@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:00:30 +0530
From:   "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bp@...en8.de, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dionnaglaze@...gle.com,
        pgonda@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] x86/mm: Add generic guest initialization hook

On 10/30/2023 10:53 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/29/23 23:36, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
>> index a37ebd3b4773..a07985a96ca5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static bool enc_status_change_finish_noop(unsigned long vaddr, int npages, bool
>>  static bool enc_tlb_flush_required_noop(bool enc) { return false; }
>>  static bool enc_cache_flush_required_noop(void) { return false; }
>>  static bool is_private_mmio_noop(u64 addr) {return false; }
>> +static void enc_init_noop(void) { }
>>  
>>  struct x86_platform_ops x86_platform __ro_after_init = {
>>  	.calibrate_cpu			= native_calibrate_cpu_early,
>> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ struct x86_platform_ops x86_platform __ro_after_init = {
>>  		.enc_status_change_finish  = enc_status_change_finish_noop,
>>  		.enc_tlb_flush_required	   = enc_tlb_flush_required_noop,
>>  		.enc_cache_flush_required  = enc_cache_flush_required_noop,
>> +		.enc_init		   = enc_init_noop,
>>  	},
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> index 9f27e14e185f..01abecc9a774 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
>> @@ -84,5 +84,8 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
>>  	/* Call into SWIOTLB to update the SWIOTLB DMA buffers */
>>  	swiotlb_update_mem_attributes();
>>  
>> +	if (x86_platform.guest.enc_init)
>> +		x86_platform.guest.enc_init();
>> +
>>  	print_mem_encrypt_feature_info();
>>  }
> 
> How does '.enc_init' ever get set to NULL?  Isn't the point of having
> and using a 'noop' function so that you don't have to do NULL checks?

True, I will remove the check.

Regards
Nikunj