[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231102113558.7f70323d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:35:58 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hte tree with the gpio-brgl
tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:11:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the hte tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/hte/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 9bc633117d6a ("hte: tegra194: add GPIOLIB dependency")
>
> from the gpio-brgl tree and commit:
>
> 63137bee5a7a ("hte: allow building modules with COMPILE_TEST enabled")
>
> from the hte tree.
>
> diff --cc drivers/hte/Kconfig
> index 8e0fd818a73e,083e67492bf2..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/hte/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hte/Kconfig
> @@@ -16,8 -16,7 +16,8 @@@ if HT
>
> config HTE_TEGRA194
> tristate "NVIDIA Tegra194 HTE Support"
> - depends on ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC
> + depends on (ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC || COMPILE_TEST)
> + depends on GPIOLIB
> help
> Enable this option for integrated hardware timestamping engine also
> known as generic timestamping engine (GTE) support on NVIDIA Tegra194
This is now a conflict between the hte tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists