[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a265e5541ab1de2258a6e61bd672ef5fb6be65f.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 12:25:07 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Wait a bit for the reset to take effect
On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 07:01 +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> otherwise the synopsys_id value may be read out wrong,
> because the GMAC_VERSION register might still be in reset
> state, for at least 1 us after the reset is de-asserted.
>
> Add a wait for 10 us before continuing to be on the safe side.
This looks like a bugfix: you should target explicitly the 'net' tree,
adding such tag into the subj. More importantly you should include a
suitable 'Fixes' tag.
Please send a new revision with the above changes. You can retain the
already collected reviewed tags.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists