linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231102115639.GC3818@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:56:39 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in
 call thunk template

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 12:50:01PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:

> > Remove static, add decl, stuff like that?
> 
> On second thought, you are right. Should I move the above function
> somewhere (reloc.c?) , or can I just use it from alternative.c and add
> decl (where?) ?

Yeah, leave it there for now, perhaps asm/text-patching.h ?