lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01b43a52-12b9-467f-b94d-475510139ba7@linux.dev>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:12:08 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
        willy@...radead.org
Cc:     rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
        42.hyeyoo@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 8/9] slub: Rename all *unfreeze_partials* functions
 to *put_partials*

On 2023/11/1 21:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/31/23 15:07, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>>
>> Since all partial slabs on the CPU partial list are not frozen anymore,
>> we don't unfreeze when moving cpu partial slabs to node partial list,
>> it's better to rename these functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 
> However I think put_partials_node() is not the best name as it's not
> something specific to a single node. I think __put_partials() would be
> better.

Right, I will change to __put_partials() in v5.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ