linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Fix kerneldoc of eventfs_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231102083634.5278a500@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:36:34 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Fix kerneldoc of eventfs_remove_rec()

On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:05:33 +0530
Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com> wrote:

> I will try to participate and take this in a good way..but i thought
> for easier change where there is no discussion is needed., it is fine
> to add if you have spent time in checking the code and change is proper.

If it's easy then automated bots will likely catch any issues. No need to
say you looked at it too. Otherwise we'll get 20 Reviewed-by tags on
comment changes.

A Reviewed-by tag has much more meaning when the code being reviewed is not
trivial, where questions about correctness is needed. In other words, if
something doesn't look quite right, ask. If it is, and the author explains
the reason it is, the fact that the explanation is now documented in the
archives is useful.

Thanks,

-- Steve