linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 22:36:15 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:02:47PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > The follow up including a statement about "being arsed" once more was
> > to Christian, not you and was rather "tongue in cheek".
> 
> Fyi, I can't be arsed to be talked to like that.
> 
> > Whether the patch is ready for reviews and whatnot is your call to
> > make as the author.
> 
> This is basically why that patch never staid in -next. Dave said this
> patch is meaningless without his other patchs and I had no reason to
> doubt that claim nor currently the cycles to benchmark and disprove it.

It was a big benefit to bcachefs performance, and I've had it in my tree
for quite some time. Was there any other holdup?