[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUPCWfO1iO77-KDA@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:38:01 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@...ikod.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Maciej Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 17/35] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for
dedicated guest memory
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 11:35 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 11/1/23 17:36, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > Can you post a fixup patch? It's not clear to me exactly what behavior you intend
> > > > to end up with.
> > >
> > > Sure, just this:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > > index 7d1a33c2ad42..34fd070e03d9 100644
> > > --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > > +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > > @@ -430,10 +430,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args)
> > > {
> > > loff_t size = args->size;
> > > u64 flags = args->flags;
> > > - u64 valid_flags = 0;
> > > -
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE))
> > > - valid_flags |= KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE;
> > > + u64 valid_flags = KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE;
> > > if (flags & ~valid_flags)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -441,11 +438,9 @@ int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args)
> > > if (size < 0 || !PAGE_ALIGNED(size))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > > if ((flags & KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE) &&
> > > !IS_ALIGNED(size, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > -#endif
> >
> > That won't work, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE is valid only for CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y.
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> > #define HPAGE_PMD_SHIFT ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
> > #define HPAGE_PMD_MASK ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
> > #define HPAGE_PMD_SIZE ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
>
> Would have caught it when actually testing it, I guess. :) It has to
> be PMD_SIZE, possibly with
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_SIZE != PMD_SIZE);
> #endif
Yeah, that works for me.
Actually, looking that this again, there's not actually a hard dependency on THP.
A THP-enabled kernel _probably_ gives a higher probability of using hugepages,
but mostly because THP selects COMPACTION, and I suppose because using THP for
other allocations reduces overall fragmentation.
So rather than honor KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE iff THP is enabled, I think
we should do the below (I verified KVM can create hugepages with THP=n). We'll
need another capability, but (a) we probably should have that anyways and (b) it
provides a cleaner path to adding PUD-sized hugepage support in the future.
And then adjust the tests like so:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
index c15de9852316..c9f449718fce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
@@ -201,6 +201,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD));
+ if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE) && thp_configured())
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(get_trans_hugepagesz(),
+ kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
+
page_size = getpagesize();
total_size = page_size * 4;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
index be311944e90a..245901587ed2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void test_mem_conversions(enum vm_mem_backing_src_type src_type, uint32_t
vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL, (1 << KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE));
- if (backing_src_can_be_huge(src_type))
+ if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
memfd_flags = KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE;
else
memfd_flags = 0;
--
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:26:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: Add best-effort hugepage support for dedicated guest
memory
Extend guest_memfd to allow backing guest memory with hugepages. For now,
make hugepage utilization best-effort, i.e. fall back to non-huge mappings
if a hugepage can't be allocated. Guaranteeing hugepages would require a
dedicated memory pool and significantly more complexity and churn..
Require userspace to opt-in via a flag even though it's unlikely real use
cases will ever want to use order-0 pages, e.g. to give userspace a safety
valve in case hugepage support is buggy, and to allow for easier testing
of both paths.
Do not take a dependency on CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, as THP enabling
primarily deals with userspace page tables, which are explicitly not in
play for guest_memfd. Selecting THP does make obtaining hugepages more
likely, but only because THP selects CONFIG_COMPACTION. Don't select
CONFIG_COMPACTION either, because again it's not a hard dependency.
For simplicity, require the guest_memfd size to be a multiple of the
hugepage size, e.g. so that KVM doesn't need to do bounds checking when
deciding whether or not to allocate a huge folio.
When reporting the max order when KVM gets a pfn from guest_memfd, force
order-0 pages if the hugepage is not fully contained by the memslot
binding, e.g. if userspace requested hugepages but punches a hole in the
memslot bindings in order to emulate x86's VGA hole.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 17 +++++++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 ++
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index e82c69d5e755..ccdd5413920d 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -6176,6 +6176,8 @@ and cannot be resized (guest_memfd files do however support PUNCH_HOLE).
__u64 reserved[6];
};
+ #define KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE (1ULL << 0)
+
Conceptually, the inode backing a guest_memfd file represents physical memory,
i.e. is coupled to the virtual machine as a thing, not to a "struct kvm". The
file itself, which is bound to a "struct kvm", is that instance's view of the
@@ -6192,6 +6194,12 @@ most one mapping per page, i.e. binding multiple memory regions to a single
guest_memfd range is not allowed (any number of memory regions can be bound to
a single guest_memfd file, but the bound ranges must not overlap).
+If KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE is set in flags, KVM will attempt to allocate
+and map PMD-size hugepages for the guest_memfd file. This is currently best
+effort. If KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE is set, size must be aligned to at
+least the size reported by KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE (which also
+enumerates support for KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE).
+
See KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 for additional details.
5. The kvm_run structure
@@ -8639,6 +8647,15 @@ block sizes is exposed in KVM_CAP_ARM_SUPPORTED_BLOCK_SIZES as a
64-bit bitmap (each bit describing a block size). The default value is
0, to disable the eager page splitting.
+
+8.41 KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE
+------------------------------------------
+
+This is an information-only capability that returns guest_memfd's hugepage size
+for PMD hugepages. Returns '0' if guest_memfd is not supported, or if KVM
+doesn't support creating hugepages for guest_memfd. Note, guest_memfd doesn't
+currently support PUD-sized hugepages.
+
9. Known KVM API problems
=========================
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 25caee8d1a80..b78d0e3bf22a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1217,6 +1217,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
#define KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO 231
#define KVM_CAP_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES 232
#define KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD 233
+#define KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE 234
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
@@ -2303,4 +2304,6 @@ struct kvm_create_guest_memfd {
__u64 reserved[6];
};
+#define KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE (1ULL << 0)
+
#endif /* __LINUX_KVM_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index 98a12da80214..31b5e94d461a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -13,14 +13,44 @@ struct kvm_gmem {
struct list_head entry;
};
+#define NR_PAGES_PER_PMD (1 << PMD_ORDER)
+
+static struct folio *kvm_gmem_get_huge_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
+{
+ unsigned long huge_index = round_down(index, NR_PAGES_PER_PMD);
+ unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)inode->i_private;
+ struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+ gfp_t gfp = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ if (!(flags & KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (filemap_range_has_page(mapping, huge_index << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (huge_index + NR_PAGES_PER_PMD - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT))
+ return NULL;
+
+ folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp, PMD_ORDER);
+ if (!folio)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, huge_index, gfp)) {
+ folio_put(folio);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ return folio;
+}
+
static struct folio *kvm_gmem_get_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
{
struct folio *folio;
- /* TODO: Support huge pages. */
- folio = filemap_grab_folio(inode->i_mapping, index);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
- return NULL;
+ folio = kvm_gmem_get_huge_folio(inode, index);
+ if (!folio) {
+ folio = filemap_grab_folio(inode->i_mapping, index);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio))
+ return NULL;
+ }
/*
* Use the up-to-date flag to track whether or not the memory has been
@@ -373,6 +403,7 @@ static int __kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, loff_t size, u64 flags)
inode->i_mode |= S_IFREG;
inode->i_size = size;
mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_HIGHUSER);
+ mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
mapping_set_unmovable(inode->i_mapping);
/* Unmovable mappings are supposed to be marked unevictable as well. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mapping_unevictable(inode->i_mapping));
@@ -394,14 +425,18 @@ static int __kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, loff_t size, u64 flags)
int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args)
{
+ u64 valid_flags = KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE;
loff_t size = args->size;
u64 flags = args->flags;
- u64 valid_flags = 0;
if (flags & ~valid_flags)
return -EINVAL;
- if (size < 0 || !PAGE_ALIGNED(size))
+ if (size <= 0 || !PAGE_ALIGNED(size))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if ((flags & KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE) &&
+ !IS_ALIGNED(size, PMD_SIZE))
return -EINVAL;
return __kvm_gmem_create(kvm, size, flags);
@@ -501,7 +536,7 @@ void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *max_order)
{
- pgoff_t index = gfn - slot->base_gfn + slot->gmem.pgoff;
+ pgoff_t index, huge_index;
struct kvm_gmem *gmem;
struct folio *folio;
struct page *page;
@@ -514,6 +549,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gmem = file->private_data;
+ index = gfn - slot->base_gfn + slot->gmem.pgoff;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_load(&gmem->bindings, index) != slot)) {
r = -EIO;
goto out_fput;
@@ -533,9 +569,24 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
page = folio_file_page(folio, index);
*pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
- if (max_order)
+ if (!max_order)
+ goto success;
+
+ *max_order = compound_order(compound_head(page));
+ if (!*max_order)
+ goto success;
+
+ /*
+ * The folio can be mapped with a hugepage if and only if the folio is
+ * fully contained by the range the memslot is bound to. Note, the
+ * caller is responsible for handling gfn alignment, this only deals
+ * with the file binding.
+ */
+ huge_index = ALIGN(index, 1ull << *max_order);
+ if (huge_index < ALIGN(slot->gmem.pgoff, 1ull << *max_order) ||
+ huge_index + (1ull << *max_order) > slot->gmem.pgoff + slot->npages)
*max_order = 0;
-
+success:
r = 0;
out_unlock:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 5d1a2f1b4e94..0711f2c75667 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -4888,6 +4888,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
case KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD:
return !kvm || kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm);
+ case KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGEPAGE_PMD_SIZE:
+ if (kvm && !kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm))
+ return 0;
+ return PMD_SIZE;
#endif
default:
break;
base-commit: fcbef1e5e5d2a60dacac0d16c06ac00bedaefc0f
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists