[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e3355e0-f0d6-5f82-d2f6-b7e84bda996c@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:14:45 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Remove atomics from test_loop to avoid test
failures
On 02/11/2023 16:22, Nick Forrington wrote:
> The current use of atomics can lead to test failures, as tests (such as
> tests/shell/record.sh) search for samples with "test_loop" as the
> top-most stack frame, but find frames related to the atomic operation
> (e.g. __aarch64_ldadd4_relax).
>
> This change simply removes the "count" variable, as it is not necessary.
>
> Fixes: 1962ab6f6e0b ("perf test workload thloop: Make count increments atomic")
> Signed-off-by: Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> index af05269c2eb8..457b29f91c3e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/thloop.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
> #include "../tests.h"
>
> static volatile sig_atomic_t done;
> -static volatile unsigned count;
>
> /* We want to check this symbol in perf report */
> noinline void test_loop(void);
> @@ -19,8 +18,7 @@ static void sighandler(int sig __maybe_unused)
>
> noinline void test_loop(void)
> {
> - while (!done)
> - __atomic_fetch_add(&count, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + while (!done);
> }
>
> static void *thfunc(void *arg)
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists