lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d25c0c3a-1866-9807-6796-7c8eecc6e1cb@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:39:22 +0530
From:   Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <qpic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add ecc engine support



On 10/31/2023 10:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/10/2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index 5f83ee42a719..b44acb1fac74 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@...4000 {
>>   			status = "disabled";
>>   		};
>>   
>> +		bch: qpic_ecc {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc";
> 
> NAK. There are so many wrong things with it... Let's start with missing
> checkpatch. Then with unndeeded label. Then with not allowed underscores
> in node names.
> Finally:
>> +			status = "ok";
> 
> Drop.
> 
Ok
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ