[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553c1373-c9a0-b2af-2286-058824e31bad@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:54:32 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <qpic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mtd: nand: ecc-qcom: Add support for ECC Engine
Driver
On 10/31/2023 10:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/10/2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>
> Eh? Empty?
QPIC controller has the ecc pipelined so will keep the ecc support
inlined in both raw nand and serial nand driver.
Droping this driver since device node was NAK-ed
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg177596.html
>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 7 ++
>> drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-qcom.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-qcom.c
>>
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_config);
>> +
>> +void qcom_ecc_enable(struct qcom_ecc *ecc)
>> +{
>> + ecc->use_ecc = true;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_enable);
>
> Drop this and all other exports. Nothing here explains the need for them.
>
>> +
>> +void qcom_ecc_disable(struct qcom_ecc *ecc)
>> +{
>> + ecc->use_ecc = false;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_ecc_disable);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id qpic_ecc_dt_match[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc",
>
> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
>
> Checkpatch is preerquisite. Don't send patches which have obvious issues
> pointed out by checkpatch. It's a waste of reviewers time.
>
>> + },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int qpic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct qpic_ecc *ecc;
>> + u32 max_eccdata_size;
>> +
>> + ecc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ecc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ecc)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ecc->caps = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> +
>> + ecc->dev = dev;
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ecc);
>> + dev_info(dev, "probed\n");
>
> No, no such messages.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists