linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add ->offline and ->online callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAYoRsUrun69UQmx1VR+0CcuM0oyQC-Sm6zAS-TETLdAyHo9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2023 08:56:29 -0700
From:   Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
To:     Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add ->offline and ->online callbacks

On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:57 AM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2020/8/25 1:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Add ->offline and ->online driver callbacks to prepare for taking a
> > CPU offline and to restore its working configuration when it goes
> > back online, respectively, to avoid invoking the ->init callback on
> > every CPU online which is quite a bit of unnecessary overhead.
> >
> > Define ->offline and ->online so that they can be used in the
> > passive mode as well as in the active mode and because ->offline
> > will do the majority of ->stop_cpu work, the passive mode does
> > not need that callback any more, so drop it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > -> v2: Typo fixes and changelog edits (Doug).
> >
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > index 3d18934fa975..98836ac299db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -2297,28 +2297,51 @@ static int intel_pstate_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +static int intel_pstate_cpu_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  {
> > +     pr_debug("CPU %d going offline\n", policy->cpu);
> > +
> > +     intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(policy);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If the CPU is an SMT thread and it goes offline with the performance
> > +      * settings different from the minimum, it will prevent its sibling
> > +      * from getting to lower performance levels, so force the minimum
> > +      * performance on CPU offline to prevent that from happening.
> > +      */
> >       if (hwp_active)
> >               intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(policy->cpu);
> >       else
> >               intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int intel_pstate_cpu_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > +     pr_debug("CPU %d going online\n", policy->cpu);
> > +
> > +     intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(policy);
> > +
> > +     if (hwp_active)
> > +             wrmsrl_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST,
> > +                           all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]->hwp_req_cached);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> >  }
>
> On Ice Lake server, there seems a bug when CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y and
> not configure intel_pstate=xxx in command line.
>
> Although the Performance tuner is used, the CPU have the lowest
> frequency in scaling_cur_freq after the CPU goes offline and then goes
> online, running the same infinite loop load.
>
> How to produce:
>
> echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
>
> cat while_true.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> void main(void)
> {
>         while(1);
> }
>
>
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# cat test.sh
> #!/bin/bash
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> taskset -c ${1} ./while_true &
> sleep 1s
>
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/online
>
> sleep 1s
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
> sleep 1s
>
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/online
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
> taskset -c ${1} ./while_true &
>
> sleep 1s
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
> sleep 1s
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
> sleep 1s
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${1}/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
>
>
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 40
> 2300000
> performance
> 2299977
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
> resource busy
> 2300000
> 2300022
> 2300000
> 2299953
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 50
> 2300000
> performance
> 2300000
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
> resource busy
> 2300000
> 2299977
> 2300022
> 2299977
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 20
> 2300000
> performance
> 2299977
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
> resource busy
> 800000
> 800000
> 800000
> 799992
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# sh test.sh 21
> 2300000
> performance
> 2300000
> cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
> resource busy
> 800000
> 800000
> 800000
> 800000
>
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# cat
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> 2300000
> [root@...alhost freq_test]# cat
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
> 800000

Hi,

I followed your "how to reproduce" notes exactly.
So far, I have been unable to reproduce your issue.

I am using kernel 6.6.
My processor is:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz

Results:
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 8
800000
performance
4799994
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4799999
4800000
4800001
4799996
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 7
800000
performance
4800001
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4799967
4800028
4800006
4799997
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 6
800000
performance
4800001
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4799983
4800001
4799993
4800002
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 5
800000
performance
4799990
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4800006
4800002
4800011
4799980
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 4
4799940
performance
4799985
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4799975
4799994
4799984
4799996
root@s19:/home/doug/pstate# ./test.sh 3
4799986
performance
4799990
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq: Device or
resource busy
4799976
4800015
4800000
4799995

... Doug