[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpob0DoXd_UTEiJf8z3JncaWk_1rgit6c4dqQ0gB6JDFxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 23:58:10 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org,
a39.skl@...il.com, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
quic_saipraka@...cinc.com, quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com,
quic_molvera@...cinc.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qipl.kernel.upstream@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu
reset operation
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
> return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
> }
>
> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE BIT(1)
> +
> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> + reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> + }
Wrong indentation. Did you run your patches through checkpatch.pl?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> + qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
>
> /*
> * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
> @@ -488,7 +506,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
> .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> - .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> + .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> };
> @@ -507,7 +525,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
> .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> - .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> + .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> };
> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
> .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> - .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> + .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
> .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists