lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 4 Nov 2023 09:34:42 +0000
From:   Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To:     Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Missing clobber on alternative use on Linux UM 32-bit

On 04/11/2023 09:25, Nadav Amit wrote:
> I was reading (again) the x86 C macro of “alternative()” and I was a bit
> surprised it does clobber the flags (“cc”) as a precaution.
> 
>    #define alternative(oldinstr, newinstr, ft_flags) \
> 	asm_inline volatile (ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr, ft_flags) : : : "memory")
> 
> Actually there seems to be only one instance of problematic cases - in um/32-bit:
> 
>    #define mb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "mfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
>    #define rmb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "lfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
>    #define wmb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "sfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM)
> 
> Presumably, if XMM or XMM2 are not supported, there would be instances where addl
> would be able to change eflags arithmetic flags without the compiler being aware
> of it.
> 
> As it only affects 32-bit Linux UM - I don’t easily have an environment to test
> the fix. An alternative (word-pun unintended) is to add “cc” as a precaution
> to the alternative macro.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-um mailing list
> linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um

Application alternatives in um is presently a NOP. It always uses the 
"blunt and heavy instrument" - the most conservative option.

It is on the TODO list.

-- 
Anton R. Ivanov
https://www.kot-begemot.co.uk/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ