lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 4 Nov 2023 15:29:29 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: triggers: netdev: add a check, whether device is up

On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Klaus Kudielka wrote:
> Some net devices do not report NO-CARRIER, if they haven't been brought
> up.

Hi Klaus

We should probably fix the driver. What device is it?

> In that case, the netdev trigger results in a wrong link state being
> displayed. Fix this, by adding a check, whether the device is up.

Is it wrong? Maybe the carrier really is up, even if the interface is
admin down. Broadcast packets are being received by the
hardware. Maybe there is a BMC sharing the link and it is active?

It is not a clear cut wrong to me. And its a way to find broken
drivers. We might want to discuss this some more.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ