[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d203024-ba5c-4258-b549-b9304622978b@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 20:53:18 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Crescent CY Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: Add RS422 flag to struct serial_rs485
Hi,
On 01.11.23 07:44, Crescent CY Hsieh wrote:
> Add "SER_RS422_ENABLED" flag within struct serial_rs485, so that serial
> port can switching interface into RS422 if supported by using ioctl
> command "TIOCSRS485".
>
> In case of interfaces confliction, add checks within
s/interfaces confliction/interface conflicts ?
> uart_sanitize_serial_rs485() such that only one of RS422/RS485 is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Crescent CY Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Revise the logic that checks whether RS422/RS485 are enabled
> simultaneously.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231030053632.5109-1-crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com/
>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/serial.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 831d03361..54a104c52 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ static int uart_get_icount(struct tty_struct *tty,
>
> #define SER_RS485_LEGACY_FLAGS (SER_RS485_ENABLED | SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND | \
> SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND | SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX | \
> - SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS)
> + SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS | SER_RS422_ENABLED)
>
How can this be a legacy flag when you just introduced it?
> static int uart_check_rs485_flags(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_rs485 *rs485)
> {
> @@ -1371,11 +1371,26 @@ static void uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_rs4
> {
> u32 supported_flags = port->rs485_supported.flags;
>
> - if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED)) {
> + if (!(rs485->flags & (SER_RS485_ENABLED | SER_RS422_ENABLED))) {
> memset(rs485, 0, sizeof(*rs485));
> return;
> }
>
> + /* Pick sane setting if the user enables both interfaces */> + if (rs485->flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED && rs485->flags & SER_RS422_ENABLED) {
> + dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
> + "%s (%d): Invalid serial interface setting, using RS485 instead\n",
> + port->name, port->line);
> + rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS422_ENABLED;
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear other bits and return if RS422 is enabled */
> + if (rs485->flags & SER_RS422_ENABLED) {> + memset(rs485, 0, sizeof(*rs485));
Why are all flags cleared but SER_RS422_ENABLED?
> + rs485->flags |= SER_RS422_ENABLED;
> + return;
> + }
What about all the other code places that check for SER_RS485_ENABLED?
For example uart_update_mctrl(), uart_suspend_port() and uart_resume_port() check this flag
to decide whether to set the modem control lines or not. Should this not also apply to
SER_RS422_ENABLED?
Maybe it would be better to change the meaning of the flag: Instead of being a substitution for
SER_RS485_ENABLED, it could be used to mark a special mode.
So if both SER_RS485_ENABLED and SER_RS485_MODE_RS422 are set it would mean that we have RS422.
Regards,
Lino
> /* Pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
> if ((supported_flags & (SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) &&
> !(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> index 53bc1af67..427609fd5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct serial_icounter_struct {
> * * %SER_RS485_ADDRB - Enable RS485 addressing mode.
> * * %SER_RS485_ADDR_RECV - Receive address filter (enables @addr_recv). Requires %SER_RS485_ADDRB.
> * * %SER_RS485_ADDR_DEST - Destination address (enables @addr_dest). Requires %SER_RS485_ADDRB.
> + *
> + * * %SER_RS422_ENABLED - RS422 enabled.
> */
> struct serial_rs485 {
> __u32 flags;
> @@ -149,6 +151,8 @@ struct serial_rs485 {
> #define SER_RS485_ADDR_RECV (1 << 7)
> #define SER_RS485_ADDR_DEST (1 << 8)
>
> +#define SER_RS422_ENABLED (1 << 9)
> +
> __u32 delay_rts_before_send;
> __u32 delay_rts_after_send;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists