[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231104005747.1389762-1-da.gomez@samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 00:57:49 +0000
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
To: "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>
CC: "gost.dev@...sung.com" <gost.dev@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
"mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] XArray multi-index tests
Add multi-index XArray tests.
Tests were first introduced as part of '[RFC PATCH 00/11] shmem: high
order folios support in write path' [1]. I've created this new series with
Matthew Wilcox's feedback [2] regarding test 'XArray: add cmpxchg order test'.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231028211518.3424020-1-da.gomez@samsung.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZT68dBiJKNLXLRZA@casper.infradead.org/
The full node is lost (not only the order) when using xa_cmpxchg with NULL
entry. Adding another (FIVE) entry at '1 << order' with the order information
does not keep the original node but duplicates it. I'm not sure if that's
the intention from the proposal you mentioned in [2] but please, let me know
your comments.
Changes since RFC:
* Update cmpxchg test to include another entry at 1 << order that
'keeps' the node around and order information.
* Update cmpxchg test to verify the entries and order in all tied
indexes.
* Drop previous Luis Chamberlain's review as changes are significant
from the RFC.
Daniel
Daniel Gomez (1):
XArray: add cmpxchg order test
Luis Chamberlain (1):
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use
lib/test_xarray.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 188 insertions(+)
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists