[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUeSaAKRemlSRQpO@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 21:02:32 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Maciej Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 20/35] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private
memory
> +static void kvm_mmu_prepare_memory_fault_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> +{
> + kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + PAGE_SIZE, fault->write, fault->exec,
> + fault->is_private);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> +{
> + int max_order, r;
> +
> + if (!kvm_slot_can_be_private(fault->slot)) {
> + kvm_mmu_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + r = kvm_gmem_get_pfn(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn, &fault->pfn,
> + &max_order);
> + if (r) {
> + kvm_mmu_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault);
> + return r;
Why report KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT here? even with a ret != -EFAULT? This is
different from the decription where KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT is introduced:
KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT will be used to report memory faults that appear to
be implicit conversions.
To allow for future possibilities where KVM reports KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT
and fills run->memory_fault on _any_ unresolved fault, KVM returns
"-EFAULT"
Thanks,
Yilun
> + }
> +
> + fault->max_level = min(kvm_max_level_for_order(max_order),
> + fault->max_level);
> + fault->map_writable = !(fault->slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY);
> +
> + return RET_PF_CONTINUE;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists