| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202311060601.Zxb8wIrg-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 06:12:57 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>
Subject: net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:652:1: error: label at end of compound
statement
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 77fa2fbe87fc605c4bfa87dff87be9bfded0e9a3
commit: 1e03d32bea8e782b7d31769c25a5fae8a5044488 net/tcp: Add TCP-AO sign to outgoing packets
date: 10 days ago
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-005-20231106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311060601.Zxb8wIrg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311060601.Zxb8wIrg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311060601.Zxb8wIrg-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c: In function 'tcp_options_write':
>> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:652:1: error: label at end of compound statement
652 | out_ao:
| ^~~~~~
vim +652 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
603
604 /* Write previously computed TCP options to the packet.
605 *
606 * Beware: Something in the Internet is very sensitive to the ordering of
607 * TCP options, we learned this through the hard way, so be careful here.
608 * Luckily we can at least blame others for their non-compliance but from
609 * inter-operability perspective it seems that we're somewhat stuck with
610 * the ordering which we have been using if we want to keep working with
611 * those broken things (not that it currently hurts anybody as there isn't
612 * particular reason why the ordering would need to be changed).
613 *
614 * At least SACK_PERM as the first option is known to lead to a disaster
615 * (but it may well be that other scenarios fail similarly).
616 */
617 static void tcp_options_write(struct tcphdr *th, struct tcp_sock *tp,
618 struct tcp_out_options *opts,
619 struct tcp_key *key)
620 {
621 __be32 *ptr = (__be32 *)(th + 1);
622 u16 options = opts->options; /* mungable copy */
623
624 if (tcp_key_is_md5(key)) {
625 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) | (TCPOPT_NOP << 16) |
626 (TCPOPT_MD5SIG << 8) | TCPOLEN_MD5SIG);
627 /* overload cookie hash location */
628 opts->hash_location = (__u8 *)ptr;
629 ptr += 4;
630 } else if (tcp_key_is_ao(key)) {
631 #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_AO
632 struct tcp_ao_key *rnext_key;
633 struct tcp_ao_info *ao_info;
634 u8 maclen;
635
636 ao_info = rcu_dereference_check(tp->ao_info,
637 lockdep_sock_is_held(&tp->inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk));
638 rnext_key = READ_ONCE(ao_info->rnext_key);
639 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rnext_key))
640 goto out_ao;
641 maclen = tcp_ao_maclen(key->ao_key);
642 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_AO << 24) |
643 (tcp_ao_len(key->ao_key) << 16) |
644 (key->ao_key->sndid << 8) |
645 (rnext_key->rcvid));
646 opts->hash_location = (__u8 *)ptr;
647 ptr += maclen / sizeof(*ptr);
648 if (unlikely(maclen % sizeof(*ptr))) {
649 memset(ptr, TCPOPT_NOP, sizeof(*ptr));
650 ptr++;
651 }
> 652 out_ao:
653 #endif
654 }
655 if (unlikely(opts->mss)) {
656 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_MSS << 24) |
657 (TCPOLEN_MSS << 16) |
658 opts->mss);
659 }
660
661 if (likely(OPTION_TS & options)) {
662 if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & options)) {
663 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_SACK_PERM << 24) |
664 (TCPOLEN_SACK_PERM << 16) |
665 (TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP << 8) |
666 TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP);
667 options &= ~OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE;
668 } else {
669 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
670 (TCPOPT_NOP << 16) |
671 (TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP << 8) |
672 TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP);
673 }
674 *ptr++ = htonl(opts->tsval);
675 *ptr++ = htonl(opts->tsecr);
676 }
677
678 if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & options)) {
679 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
680 (TCPOPT_NOP << 16) |
681 (TCPOPT_SACK_PERM << 8) |
682 TCPOLEN_SACK_PERM);
683 }
684
685 if (unlikely(OPTION_WSCALE & options)) {
686 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
687 (TCPOPT_WINDOW << 16) |
688 (TCPOLEN_WINDOW << 8) |
689 opts->ws);
690 }
691
692 if (unlikely(opts->num_sack_blocks)) {
693 struct tcp_sack_block *sp = tp->rx_opt.dsack ?
694 tp->duplicate_sack : tp->selective_acks;
695 int this_sack;
696
697 *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
698 (TCPOPT_NOP << 16) |
699 (TCPOPT_SACK << 8) |
700 (TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE + (opts->num_sack_blocks *
701 TCPOLEN_SACK_PERBLOCK)));
702
703 for (this_sack = 0; this_sack < opts->num_sack_blocks;
704 ++this_sack) {
705 *ptr++ = htonl(sp[this_sack].start_seq);
706 *ptr++ = htonl(sp[this_sack].end_seq);
707 }
708
709 tp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
710 }
711
712 if (unlikely(OPTION_FAST_OPEN_COOKIE & options)) {
713 struct tcp_fastopen_cookie *foc = opts->fastopen_cookie;
714 u8 *p = (u8 *)ptr;
715 u32 len; /* Fast Open option length */
716
717 if (foc->exp) {
718 len = TCPOLEN_EXP_FASTOPEN_BASE + foc->len;
719 *ptr = htonl((TCPOPT_EXP << 24) | (len << 16) |
720 TCPOPT_FASTOPEN_MAGIC);
721 p += TCPOLEN_EXP_FASTOPEN_BASE;
722 } else {
723 len = TCPOLEN_FASTOPEN_BASE + foc->len;
724 *p++ = TCPOPT_FASTOPEN;
725 *p++ = len;
726 }
727
728 memcpy(p, foc->val, foc->len);
729 if ((len & 3) == 2) {
730 p[foc->len] = TCPOPT_NOP;
731 p[foc->len + 1] = TCPOPT_NOP;
732 }
733 ptr += (len + 3) >> 2;
734 }
735
736 smc_options_write(ptr, &options);
737
738 mptcp_options_write(th, ptr, tp, opts);
739 }
740
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists