[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231106093157.24f46f82@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:31:57 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...tanamicro.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-riscv tree with the risc-v
tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 13:37:43 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:53:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-riscv tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 43c16d51a19b ("RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commits:
> >
> > db3c01c7a308 ("RISCV: KVM: Add senvcfg context save/restore")
> > 81f0f314fec9 ("RISCV: KVM: Add sstateen0 context save/restore")
> >
> > from the kvm-riscv tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I just used the latter version of this file) and can
> > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> This is now a conflict between the kvm tree and the risc-v tree.
This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists