lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f30438ab-01e4-4847-a72d-5a4107d7ba46@linux.dev>
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 23:03:44 +0300
From:   Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: extra zram_get_element call in
 zram_read_from_zspool()

On 11/6/23 22:55, Vasily Averin wrote:
> 'element' and 'handle' are union in struct zram_table_entry.

struct zram_table_entry {
        union {
                unsigned long handle;
                unsigned long element;
        };

I do not understand the sense of this union.
>From my POV it just makes it harder to check the code because an reviewer doesn't
expect that the zram element can't be used together.
Can I remove this union at all and replace zram_get/set_element calls by zram_get/set_handle instead?

Thank you,
	Vasily Averin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ