[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUlTB5diiytEK-Mh@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:56:39 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@....com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] net: add support for skbs with unreadable frags
On 11/05, Mina Almasry wrote:
> For device memory TCP, we expect the skb headers to be available in host
> memory for access, and we expect the skb frags to be in device memory
> and unaccessible to the host. We expect there to be no mixing and
> matching of device memory frags (unaccessible) with host memory frags
> (accessible) in the same skb.
>
> Add a skb->devmem flag which indicates whether the frags in this skb
> are device memory frags or not.
>
> __skb_fill_page_desc() now checks frags added to skbs for page_pool_iovs,
> and marks the skb as skb->devmem accordingly.
>
> Add checks through the network stack to avoid accessing the frags of
> devmem skbs and avoid coalescing devmem skbs with non devmem skbs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
[..]
> - snaplen = skb->len;
> + snaplen = skb_frags_not_readable(skb) ? skb_headlen(skb) : skb->len;
>
> res = run_filter(skb, sk, snaplen);
> if (!res)
> @@ -2279,7 +2279,7 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> - snaplen = skb->len;
> + snaplen = skb_frags_not_readable(skb) ? skb_headlen(skb) : skb->len;
>
> res = run_filter(skb, sk, snaplen);
> if (!res)
Not sure it covers 100% of bpf. We might need to double-check bpf_xdp_copy_buf
which is having its own, non-skb shinfo and frags. And in general, xdp
can reference those shinfo frags early... (xdp part happens
before we create an skb with all devmem association)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists