lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n50HwE+gNYotYXduer3b=O+c3ZWLC_8gEmpo0KQmtzmNvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:55:58 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Atul Dhudase <quic_adhudase@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        isaacm@...eaurora.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix dis_cap_alloc and retain_on_pc configuration

Quoting Mukesh Ojha (2023-11-05 22:54:28)
>
>
> On 11/4/2023 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 04:27:12PM +0530, Atul Dhudase wrote:
> >> While programming dis_cap_alloc and retain_on_pc, set a bit
> >> corresponding to a specific SCID without disturbing the
> >> previously configured bits.
> >>
> >
> > As far as I can see, the only invocation of _qcom_llcc_cfg_program()
> > comes from qcom_llcc_cfg_program(), which is only called once, from
> > qcom_llcc_probe(), and here also seems to only be the single write to
> > these two registers.
>
> It does not look to be single write but the write is for each slice
> in the same register which was overriding other slices values.

Can you add that detail to the commit text? What's the seriousness of
the issue? Why should it be backported to stable? Is something seriously
broken because a slice configuration is overwritten? Does it mean that
some allocation made in a slice is being lost over power collapse (pc)
when it shouldn't be?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ