[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b0f8705-71cb-4c4c-a70c-d9d3a15886cb@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:31:57 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
CC: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
<oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>,
<oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alobakin:pfcp 5/20] drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:363
adis16475_set_freq() warn: set_bit() takes a bit number
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:50:03 +0300
Hi,
> tree: https://github.com/alobakin/linux pfcp
> head: 89565e300e3d4033b8bb568774804fdc09d4f3cc
> commit: 945a0d6e86d97bf60f2fae88ee557ed3eae18b94 [5/20] bitops: let the compiler optimize {__,}assign_bit()
> config: i386-randconfig-141-20231105 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311060647.i9XyO4ej-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311060647.i9XyO4ej-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202311060647.i9XyO4ej-lkp@intel.com/
>
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:363 adis16475_set_freq() warn: set_bit() takes a bit number
> drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:363 adis16475_set_freq() warn: clear_bit() takes a bit number
> drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:416 adis16475_set_filter() warn: set_bit() takes a bit number
> drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:416 adis16475_set_filter() warn: clear_bit() takes a bit number
>
> vim +363 drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c
>
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 357
> 9da1b86865ab43 Nuno Sá 2021-09-20 358 adis_dev_unlock(&st->adis);
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 359 /*
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 360 * If decimation is used, then gyro and accel data will have meaningful
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 361 * bits on the LSB registers. This info is used on the trigger handler.
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 362 */
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 @363 assign_bit(ADIS16475_LSB_DEC_MASK, &st->lsb_flag, dec);
>
> assign_bit() takes a bit number like 0. But this is passing BIT(0) so
> it's like BIT(BIT(0)). Which is fine until you get to 5.
Is this intended? There are 2 places where you pass
%ADIS16475_LSB_DEC_MASK and %ADIS16475_LSB_FIR_MASK, which is `BIT(0)`
and `BIT(1)` respectively, to assign_bit(), which takes 0, 1 etc.
>
>
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 364
> fff7352bf7a3ce Nuno Sá 2020-04-13 365 return 0;
> 39c024b51b5607 Nuno Sa 2021-02-18 366 error:
> 15aacc980dcb32 Nuno Sa 2021-02-18 367 adis_dev_unlock(&st->adis);
> 39c024b51b5607 Nuno Sa 2021-02-18 368 return ret;
>
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists