linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:25:34 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert "usb: phy: add usb phy notify port status API"

On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:15:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > The recently added Realtek PHY drivers depend on the new port status
> > notification mechanism which was built on the deprecated USB PHY
> > implementation and devicetree binding.
> > 
> > Specifically, using these PHYs would require describing the very same
> > PHY using both the generic "phy" property and the deprecated "usb-phy"
> > property which is clearly wrong.
> > 
> > We should not be building new functionality on top of the legacy USB PHY
> > implementation even if it is currently stuck in some kind of
> > transitional limbo.
> > 
> > Revert the new Realtek PHY drivers for now so that the port status
> > notification interface can be reverted and replaced before we dig
> > ourselves into an even deeper hole with this PHY mess.
> > 
> > Note that there are no upstream users of these PHYs and the drivers were
> > only included in 6.6 so there should still be time to undo this.
> 
> No users of these phy drivers yet?  Why were they added?

The devicetree bindings were also merged in 6.6 (and are left in place),
but there are no devicetrees that actually use these new bindings in
mainline yet.

> > Preferably these should go in through Greg's tree for 6.7-rc1.
> 
> I'll be glad to take this if I can get an ack for it.

They went in through your tree, but note that you may now get a conflict
with 

	7e909370a5cd ("phy: realtek: Replace of_device.h with explicit includes")

in the phy tree.

Johan