[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41eff9b4-3041-4a1e-ba28-b16d866cd894@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:39:48 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
CC: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
<oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>,
<oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alobakin:pfcp 5/20] drivers/iio/imu/adis16475.c:363
adis16475_set_freq() warn: set_bit() takes a bit number
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 13:02:58 +0100
> On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 12:18 +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:07:16 +0100
[...]
>> assign_bit() does not take a bitmask as a first argument, but a bit number.
>>
>> I.e. if you want to switch BIT(0), you call it like assign_bit(0, ...),
>> not assign_bit(BIT(0), ...). Same for the bit nr 1.
>>
>
> Yes, I know... if you look at my reply to Dan you can see I realized that already :)
Oh okay :)
>
> I guess by the time I first sent this time I didn't knew or maybe just a dumb
> mistake...
>
> I'll send a patch later today removing the BIT() from the #define, thx!
Nice! Don't forget the tags the build bot asked for :p
BTW, I believe the reason why this warning triggered after my commit is
that before it, assign_bit() is a static inline, but becomes a macro
then. smatch becomes able to see through it that it indeed is a wrapper
around set_bit()/clear_bit() and realizes the first argument is invalid.
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists