[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gFTdVH7Kr3cHcb+stGx_E-rm=B5h+z4ZFqfY=M9=Jffw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:09:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Use %rip-relative addressing in wakeup_64.S
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 11:49 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Instruction with %rip-relative address operand is one byte shorter than
> > > its absolute address counterpart and is also compatible with position
> > > independent executable (-fpie) build.
> > >
> > > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > I'm wondering what's the exact motivation for making this change.
>
> Mainly to be consistent with what the compiler emits by default when a
> symbol is accessed. As said in the commit message, the %rip-relative
> access is also one byte shorter, and results in a position independent
> code.
>
> > Any urgent need for it doesn't seem to be there.
>
> True. It's mostly a nice-to-have change.
OK, so
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
and the decision what to do with it is up to the x86 folks.
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > index d5d8a352eafa..94ff83f3d3fe 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
> > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > > * Hooray, we are in Long 64-bit mode (but still running in low memory)
> > > */
> > > SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
> > > - movq saved_magic, %rax
> > > + movq saved_magic(%rip), %rax
> > > movq $0x123456789abcdef0, %rdx
> > > cmpq %rdx, %rax
> > > je 2f
> > > @@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(wakeup_long64)
> > > movw %ax, %es
> > > movw %ax, %fs
> > > movw %ax, %gs
> > > - movq saved_rsp, %rsp
> > > + movq saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp
> > >
> > > - movq saved_rbx, %rbx
> > > - movq saved_rdi, %rdi
> > > - movq saved_rsi, %rsi
> > > - movq saved_rbp, %rbp
> > > + movq saved_rbx(%rip), %rbx
> > > + movq saved_rdi(%rip), %rdi
> > > + movq saved_rsi(%rip), %rsi
> > > + movq saved_rbp(%rip), %rbp
> > >
> > > - movq saved_rip, %rax
> > > + movq saved_rip(%rip), %rax
> > > ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
> > > jmp *%rax
> > > SYM_FUNC_END(wakeup_long64)
> > > @@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(do_suspend_lowlevel)
> > >
> > > movq $.Lresume_point, saved_rip(%rip)
> > >
> > > - movq %rsp, saved_rsp
> > > - movq %rbp, saved_rbp
> > > - movq %rbx, saved_rbx
> > > - movq %rdi, saved_rdi
> > > - movq %rsi, saved_rsi
> > > + movq %rsp, saved_rsp(%rip)
> > > + movq %rbp, saved_rbp(%rip)
> > > + movq %rbx, saved_rbx(%rip)
> > > + movq %rdi, saved_rdi(%rip)
> > > + movq %rsi, saved_rsi(%rip)
> > >
> > > addq $8, %rsp
> > > movl $3, %edi
> > > --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists