[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2b73ea0-c659-431e-9275-88d1a98f37cf@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:05:36 -0800
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: Add SM8450
On 11/5/2023 5:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/11/2023 23:52, Elliot Berman wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>
>> SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new
>> compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No
>> changes to this patch from the original version:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@linaro.org/
>>
>
> I don't understand why do you send this. This is not a correct patch,
> was rejected. Different patch was already merged.
I see that 6.6 has
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi?h=v6.6#n1741
but bindings not updated:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml?h=v6.6
I came up with similar-ish fix offline, then found Konrad had posted the patch when searching lore.
I didn't find any other patch on lore.
I think you rejected a proposal to drop "p" from "prng", but this patch
doesn't do that and we stayed course with naming scheme.
Thanks,
Elliot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists