[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231106184052.1166579-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 20:40:52 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Amend IRQ check
From: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
platform_get_irq() returns a negative error code to indicating an
error. All the same does pci_alloc_irq_vectors() and pci_irq_vector().
So in intel_lpss_probe() the erroneous IRQ should be better returned
as is.
The pci_alloc_irq_vectors() call and platform_get_irq() guarantee
that IRQ won't be 0, hence drop that check.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
[andy: updated commit message]
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
index 9591b354072a..4c9d0222751a 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
@@ -378,9 +378,12 @@ int intel_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
struct intel_lpss *lpss;
int ret;
- if (!info || !info->mem || info->irq <= 0)
+ if (!info || !info->mem)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (info->irq < 0)
+ return info->irq;
+
lpss = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpss), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lpss)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists