[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUk3q/H/swmDPRo+@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 18:59:55 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>
Cc: kernel-team@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
riel@...riel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: Fix for negative counter: nr_file_hugepages
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:19:18AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2740,7 +2740,8 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SHMEM_THPS,
> -nr);
> - } else {
> + } else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
> +
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_THPS,
> -nr);
> filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
Good catch. Two things:
1. No blank line after the 'else if'.
2. We're leaving a bit of a landmine for shmem when it gets support for
arbitrary folio sizes. Really all of this should be under a
test_pmd_mappable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists