[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7506203-8633-4b94-aa66-ebab4436f300@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:11:47 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: PeterYin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>, patrick@...cx.xyz,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus) Add support for MPS Multi-phase
mp5990
On 11/6/23 00:02, PeterYin wrote:
>
[ ... ]
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id mp5990_of_match[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "mps,mp5990" },
>>> + {}
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct i2c_device_id mp5990_id[] = {
>>> + {"mp5990", 0},
>>> + { }
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mp5990_id);
>>> +
>>> +static struct i2c_driver mp5990_driver = {
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = "mp5990",
>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mp5990_of_match),
>>
>> Using of_match_ptr() will result in a build failure if CONFIG_OF=n.
>>
> Should I use .of_match_table = mp5990_of_match, ?
>
Yes.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists