lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttpyw1ez.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date:   Tue, 07 Nov 2023 16:57:40 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix signature of pfn_to_kaddr()

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> writes:
> There is a const in the returned value from pfn_to_kaddr()
> but there are consumers that want to modify the result
> and the generic function pfn_to_virt() in <asm-generic/page.h>
> does allow this, so let's relax this requirement and do not
> make the returned value const.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311061940.4pBrm44u-lkp@intel.com/
 
I'm struggling to connect the removal of const with those bug reports.
It looks like all those warnings are about 0xc000000000000000 being
outside the range of unsigned long when building 32-bit.

Is it the right bug report link?

The current signature of:

  static inline const void *pfn_to_kaddr(unsigned long pfn) ...

seems OK to me.

It allows code like:

  const void *p = pfn_to_kaddr(pfn);
  p++;

But errors for:

  const void *p = pfn_to_kaddr(pfn);
  unsigned long *q = p;
  *q = 0;

  error: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type


Having said that it looks like almost every caller of pfn_to_kaddr()
casts the result to unsigned long, so possibly that would be the better
return type in terms of the actual usage. Although that would conflict
with __va() which returns void * :/

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ