linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/exec.c: Add fast path for ENOENT on PATH search before allocating mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202311071228.27D22C00@keescook>
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:30:37 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:     Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/exec.c: Add fast path for ENOENT on PATH search
 before allocating mm

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:41:30PM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Currently, execve allocates an mm and parses argv and envp before
> checking if the path exists. However, the common case of a $PATH search
> may have several failed calls to exec before a single success. Do a
> filename lookup for the purposes of returning ENOENT before doing more
> expensive operations.
> 
> This does not create a TOCTTOU race, because this can only happen if the
> file didn't exist at some point during the exec call, and that point is
> permitted to be when we did our lookup.
> 
> To measure performance, I ran 2000 fork and execvpe calls with a
> seven-element PATH in which the file was found in the seventh directory
> (representative of the common case as /usr/bin is the seventh directory
> on my $PATH), as well as 2000 fork and execve calls with an absolute
> path to an existing binary. I recorded the minimum time for each, to
> eliminate noise from context switches and similar.
> 
> Without fast-path:
> fork/execvpe: 49876ns
> fork/execve:  32773ns
> 
> With fast-path:
> fork/execvpe: 36890ns
> fork/execve:  32069ns
> 
> The cost of the additional lookup seems to be in the noise for a
> successful exec, but it provides a 26% improvement for the path search
> case by speeding up the six failed execs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>

*thread necromancy*

I'll snag this patch after -rc1 is out. Based on the research we both
did in the rest of this thread, this original patch is a clear win.
Let's get it into linux-next and see if anything else falls out of it.

I did, however, scratch my head over the 0-day report:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202209221401.90061e56-yujie.liu@intel.com/

But I can't see why this patch could trigger those problems...

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook