[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231107215742.363031-48-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:57:33 -0800
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, mingo@...nel.org,
bristot@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de,
anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, mattst88@...il.com,
krypton@...ich-teichert.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com,
Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 47/86] rcu: select PREEMPT_RCU if PREEMPT
With PREEMPTION being always-on, some configurations might prefer
the stronger forward-progress guarantees provided by PREEMPT_RCU=n
as compared to PREEMPT_RCU=y.
So, select PREEMPT_RCU=n for PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and PREEMPT_NONE and
enabling PREEMPT_RCU=y for PREEMPT or PREEMPT_RT.
Note that the preemption model can be changed at runtime (modulo
configurations with ARCH_NO_PREEMPT), but the RCU configuration
is statically compiled.
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
---
CC-note: Paul had flagged some code that might be impacted
with the proposed RCU changes:
1. My guess is that the IPVS_EST_TICK_CHAINS heuristic remains
unchanged, but I must defer to the include/net/ip_vs.h people.
2. I need to check with the BPF folks on the BPF verifier's
definition of BTF_ID(func, rcu_read_unlock_strict).
3. I must defer to others on the mm/pgtable-generic.c file's
#ifdef that depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU.
Detailed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a375674b-de27-4965-a4bf-e0679229e28e@paulmck-laptop/
---
include/linux/rcutree.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 126f6b418f6a..75aaa6294421 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ extern int rcu_scheduler_active;
void rcu_end_inkernel_boot(void);
bool rcu_inkernel_boot_has_ended(void);
bool rcu_is_watching(void);
-#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
void rcu_all_qs(void);
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index bdd7eadb33d8..a808cb29ab7c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config TREE_RCU
config PREEMPT_RCU
bool
- default y if PREEMPTION
+ default y if PREEMPT || PREEMPT_RT
select TREE_RCU
help
This option selects the RCU implementation that is
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ config PREEMPT_RCU
config TINY_RCU
bool
- default y if !PREEMPTION && !SMP
+ default y if !PREEMPT && !SMP
help
This option selects the RCU implementation that is
designed for UP systems from which real-time response
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists