[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78ee82da-bad9-4253-8aba-35ce6a36b65c@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:14:03 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mn-var-som-symphony: add vcc supply for
PCA9534
On 06/11/2023 22:36, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 21:39:42 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/11/2023 19:57, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>>> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
>>>
>>> The following warning is shown when probing device:
>>>
>>> pca953x 1-0020: supply vcc not found, using dummy regulator
>>>
>>> Add fixed 3.3v regulator as vcc supply to silence the warning.
>>>
>>
>> This is not really a warning. It's perfectly fine to use dummy
>> regulator. Adding such fixed supply has sense in following cases:
>> 1. Bindings require the supply,
>> 2. This is in fact exactly that supply (verified on schematics).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> this is case #2, but looking more closely at the carrier board
> (symphony) schematics, it is not exactly the "reg_3v3_fixed" supply I
> mentioned in the patch, as "reg_3v3_fixed" is located on the SOM and
> only powers SOM components.
>
> However, "reg_3v3_fixed", which is an always-on regulator (no software
> enable control), is used as the enable input to a mosfet switch (Q2) on
> the carrier board to generate the 3.3V (label BASE_PER_3V3 on the
> schematics) used by all peripherals on that carrier board.
>
> I guess I could then define a new "always-on" regulator labeled as,
> for example, base_per_3v3, and then assign the pca953x vcc-supply
> property to it?
I guess this could be the same supply, even if this is not 100% true.
However it would be good if you put above explanation in the commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists