linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v10 3/5] riscv: Checksum header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB57517DB5180352D536565A4FB8A9A@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2023 07:33:19 +0000
From:   "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
To:     Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        "Evan Green" <evan@...osinc.com>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 3/5] riscv: Checksum header



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 6:48 AM
> To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>; Palmer Dabbelt
> <palmer@...belt.com>; Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>; Samuel Holland
> <samuel.holland@...ive.com>; David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>;
> Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>; Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>;
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> arch@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>; Albert Ou
> <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Conor Dooley
> <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v10 3/5] riscv: Checksum header

Is it better to make the title more descriptive as "riscv: Add checksum header"?

> 
> Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> register to avoid some overflow checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 81
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3d77cac338fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Checksum routines
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> +
> +/* Define riscv versions of functions before importing asm-
> generic/checksum.h */
> +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> will
> + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> to 5.
> + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned given that NET_IP_ALIGN is set to 2 on
> + *	riscv, defining IP headers to be aligned.
> + */

For comments on API parameters, it's better to follow the "@para: xxx" standard format
and indention alignment used in other places.

> +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> +{
> +	unsigned long csum = 0;
> +	int pos = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> +			csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> +	} while (++pos < ihl);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> +	 * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> +	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> +		unsigned long fold_temp;
> +
> +		asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> +					      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> +		    :
> +		    :
> +		    :
> +		    : no_zbb);
> +
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> +			asm(".option push				\n\
> +			.option arch,+zbb				\n\
> +				not	%[fold_temp], %[csum]
> 	\n\
> +				rori	%[csum], %[csum], 16		\n\
> +				sub	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> 	\n\
> +			.option pop"
> +			: [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> +		} else {
> +			asm(".option push				\n\
> +			.option arch,+zbb				\n\
> +				rori	%[fold_temp], %[csum], 32	\n\
> +				add	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> 	\n\
> +				srli	%[csum], %[csum], 32		\n\
> +				not	%[fold_temp], %[csum]
> 	\n\
> +				roriw	%[csum], %[csum], 16		\n\
> +				subw	%[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> 	\n\
> +			.option pop"
> +			: [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> +		}
> +		return csum >> 16;
> +	}
> +no_zbb:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> +	csum += ror64(csum, 32);
> +	csum >>= 32;
> +#endif
> +	return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> +}

The algorithm looks good to me.

BRs,
Xiao

> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H */
> 
> --
> 2.34.1