[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231107090838.260730-1-aliceryhl@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:08:38 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@...roid.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/21] binder: malloc new_buffer outside of locks
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> writes:
> Preallocate new_buffer before acquiring the alloc->mutex and hand it
> down to binder_alloc_new_buf_locked(). The new buffer will be used in
> the vast majority of requests (measured at 98.2% in field data). The
> buffer is discarded otherwise. This change is required in preparation
> for transitioning alloc->mutex into a spinlock in subsequent commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
You also need to free the new buffer here:
if (unlikely(!best_fit)) {
binder_alloc_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_USER_ERROR,
"%d: binder_alloc_buf size %zd failed, no address space\n",
alloc->pid, size);
debug_no_space_locked(alloc);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
}
Other than the above, this looks correct to me.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists